What has so far been consistently ignored by German courts is now officially on the table in Karlsruhe – based on NEXT LEVEL’s argumentation strategy and analyses.
The constitutional complaint on the obligation to provide evidence of measles has been submitted – with a focus that is quite something.
The pathogen has never been scientifically proven
The RKI itself had to admit in writing in an IFG decision dated 28 May 2025: There are no negative controls for virus cultivation or genome sequencing. A clear violation of DFG Guideline 11 – and of Section 1 (2) IfSG, which prescribes scientific work.
And that’s not all
The constitutional complaint demonstrates that all five RKI studies on the “measles virus” were neither methodologically controlled nor blinded – contrary to the binding requirements of the German Research Foundation.
The so-called “cytopathic effect ” – a classic “virus” criterion – also occurs in control samples without virus material. Even Enders, Cohen and Magnus had to admit this in the original publications on the “measles virus”.
The bombshell: The RKI justifies the lack of negative controls by claiming that, among other things, “genome sequencing has already provided proof of the virus” – although the RKI files and the court record on the “measles virus trial” make it clear that genome data is not proof of the pathogen. An outright self-contradiction.
All of this is now part of an official fundamental rights procedure in Karlsruhe (file number AR 3749/25 for the time being). The question of the existence and scientific proof of pathogens is therefore before the Federal Constitutional Court for the first time in history.
UPDATES will follow exclusively at NEXT LEVEL.
Source: Next Level Telegram channel; Website Next Level-Wissen neu gedacht
