The high-profile civil lawsuit filed in the District Court of Northern Netherlands in Leeuwarden, seven Dutch citizens have brought claims against prominent figures, including Bill Gates, Ursula von der Leyen, Klaus Schwab, and Mark Rutte, along with other defendants such as Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla and Dutch officials over the COVID-19 Response. The plaintiffs allege that these individuals and entities misled the public about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, resulting in physical and mental injuries. The case, which has garnered significant international attention, centers on accusations of conspiracy, bioterrorism, and promoting a globalist agenda tied to the World Economic Forum’s “Great Reset.” It also highlights a specific Pfizer vaccine batch, EM0477, allegedly linked to severe injuries and deaths.The lawsuit was initiated by attorneys Arno van Kessel and Peter Stassen, representing the plaintiffs, who claim the defendants’ actions during the COVID-19 pandemic caused harm through coercive policies, suppressed data, and secretive vaccine contracts.
A key point of contention is the transparency of vaccine procurement, particularly Ursula von der Leyen’s negotiations with Pfizer, which have been criticized for lacking public oversight. Nearly 200 pieces of evidence, including autopsy reports and whistleblower testimonies from figures like former Pfizer VP Dr. Mike Yeadon and financial expert Catherine Austin Fitts, have been submitted to support the plaintiffs’ claims.
There have been major efforts to stop this court case. On October 16, 2024, the court ruled against Bill Gates’ attempt to dismiss the case on jurisdictional grounds, stating it had international jurisdiction over him due to the interconnected nature of the claims. Gates was ordered to pay legal costs of approximately €1,406. The court clarified that this was a civil, not criminal, case. On June 11, 2025, Arno van Kessel was arrested in a late-night raid by Dutch authorities. Described as a “military-style” operation, van Kessel was blindfolded, detained without formal charges, and held for at least 90 days, prompting accusations of intimidation. Dutch outlet De Andere Krant reported that authorities labeled him a “suspect in a criminal network” without providing evidence, leading to speculation that his arrest was linked to the case’s sensitive nature. To this day van Kessel is still held in a maximum-security prison. Despite this, Peter Stassen continued to represent the plaintiffs, delivering what was described as a “fiery” argument at the July 9, 2025, hearing, calling the vaccine program “the greatest genocide of humanity ever.”
The case continues to spark debate, with supporters viewing it as a challenge to global health policies and critics dismissing it as rooted in conspiracy theories. The outcome could set precedents for transparency in public health and international jurisdiction in civil lawsuits.
Jim Ferguson now reports that the witnesses, ready to testify that the mRNA injections may constitute crimes against humanity were blocked by the judge from giving any testimonies.
Ferguson writes on twitter: “the court just blocked five expert witnesses from testifying on what they claim is the true nature of the Covid-19 mRNA injections — not vaccines, but biochemical and technological weapons. The expert witnesses officially named in the legal filings were Katherine Watt, Catherine Austin Fitts (The Solari Report), Dr. Mike Yeadon (former Pfizer VP), Dr. Joseph Sansone, Sasha Latypova (biotech industry veteran). Also named was Prof. Francis Boyle, architect of the U.S. Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act. He had agreed to testify—but died suddenly before the hearing, under circumstances that remain unclear.”
The deciscion will be appealed.
