A study called “Project Scan 2000” is currently being advertised in the alternative enlightenment scene. The following is an extract from the study description.
Working hypothesis and aim of the study: “Scan 2000 is a citizen science study, as we know it from the Hour of the Garden Birds. This means that the study takes place with the help of normal people and is not organised by the pharmaceutical industry, scientists or doctors. You could say it is participatory science. For this to work, the test system has to be simple and the data collection has to be automated and standardised so that any normal person can carry it out. We (Holger Reißner, Dr Stefanie Merse and Dr Sabine Stebel) have joined forces to estimate the immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels of the population in the DACH region in order to be able to estimate the percentage of potential vaccine damage. These systems have been used in the plandemic in testing centres, doctors and pharmacies for rapid COVID tests and are therefore accepted, validated measurement systems by the WHO, as they have already used them for their purposes. We are now using these devices for our educational purposes. The principle is similar to the one we learnt in school when we broke down ink on blotting paper into its components. The principle is also familiar from pregnancy tests and corona tests. After a certain time, the device recognises a signal that it can automatically read out qualitatively according to BAU units.”
Question: Can this test really estimate the percentage of potential vaccine damage? The answer to this question is “no”, as the following facts apply:
Facts:
1. no SARS-CoV-2 has ever been isolated and biochemically characterised. Therefore, statements about the properties of the spike protein, which is supposed to be a component of SARS-CoV-2, are purely hypothetical.
2. m-RNA technology has been the subject of research for over 30 years. No vaccination has ever been authorised because the technology does not work. The statement that vaccinated people produce spike proteins is therefore purely hypothetical.
3. a test based on the principle of corona tests is used. As specific antibodies are only a model concept, these tests must be critically scrutinised.
4. a device is advertised that has been authorised by the WHO. Is the WHO really an authority that serves the good of the people?
Conclusion: How credible are the results of this project with regard to the facts listed? Every vaccination is poison for the body and does not generate “immunity”, as pathogens that cause disease are only based on hypothetical assumptions. The sense or nonsense of all vaccinations must therefore be critically scrutinised.
Further information on this and other topics can be found on the science platform NEXT LEVEL – Wissen neu gedacht.
