mRNA vaccine a failed idea

mRNA vaccine a failed idea- 2

In a post on X, Sture Blomberg, a Swedish doctor and specialist in anaesthesia and gynaecology, describes how mRNA vaccines are a bad idea, doomed to fail. He writes:

“The mRNA technology to vaccinate people is of course a completely crazy idea. But the fact that this idea is truly crazy is not easily explained to politicians or journalists, let alone to ordinary people. So why is it crazy? Imagine a medieval castle. It has three lines of defence: 1) the moat, 2) the very high impregnable 2-3 metre thick walls (unless you put up ladders) and 3) an inner castle to which the inhabitants flee if the enemy gets past lines 1 and 2.

It is the same with the immune system. The first line of defence is skin, mucous membranes with IgA antibodies, stomach acid. The second line of defence is the innate immune system, including T cells, and the third line of defence is the acquired immune system with the formation of IgG antibodies. We are now being led to believe that the best defence is to allow the enemy to pass through lines of defence 1 and 2 and to use helicopters to place enemy soldiers in the inner courtyard to fight the inhabitants, where these enemy soldiers can multiply indefinitely and become as numerous as they like. This is exactly what mRNA technology does. My conclusion is that anyone who thinks this is a good idea as a defence against infections must be insane or, alternatively, have evil intentions.”

He also points out that Dr Sherri Tenpenny has said that she was aware of research into altering DNA going on for at least 40 years and mRNA technology for at least 25 years. Sture Blomberg does not believe that this is a case of accidental DNA contamination but goes on to say that:

“The technology itself has a completely different purpose than what has been officially claimed. But this is not easily explained to politicians, journalists or ordinary people. It is easy to get tangled up and stumble in the attempts at persuasion. The fact that the technology risks changing people’s DNA – with all that this entails – is easily understood. And with altered DNA, future generations risk suffering from many of the now unmentioned side effects that come with mRNA injections.”

The X post of Doctors’ Appeal:

https://twitter.com/lakaruppropet1/status/1866587822745850312

The webpage of Doctors’ Appeal.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
×