An alarming new study shows that the bodies of people who have received COVID-19 mRNA injections can become “vaccine factories”. The peer-reviewed study, co-authored by renowned cardiologist Dr Peter McCullough, was published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.
Source: Uncut-News.ch, 10 Dec. 2024
Key points of the study
The researchers found that vaccinated individuals produce different amounts of the spike protein over varying periods of time, depending on genetic, age-related and hormonal factors, as well as the specific batch of vaccine. The study focussed mainly on the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, whose development and approval process is critically examined.
Genetic manipulation and lack of safety studies
The mRNA injections are described in the study as gene-modifying technologies that have little in common with conventional vaccines. Unlike traditional vaccines, mRNA “vaccines” instruct the cells to produce the spike protein of the virus directly.
The researchers criticise the fact that no comprehensive safety studies have been carried out to analyse the distribution and effects of the spike protein in the body. In particular, there is a lack of data on genotoxicity, carcinogenicity and effects on pregnant or breastfeeding women. In addition, the regulatory authorities should have categorised the mRNA injections as gene therapy products, which would have resulted in stricter regulatory requirements. Instead, they were incorrectly classified as conventional vaccines.
Incomplete authorisation data and gaps in the tests
The study revealed serious gaps in the authorisation procedure:
- Pfizer did not conduct pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of the spike protein, even though it was known to be toxic.
- The biological distribution studies were carried out with luciferase proteins instead of the actual spike protein, which could falsify the results.
- Toxicity studies were carried out on Wistar-Han™ rats, an animal species that is unsuitable for such studies. There is also a lack of data on male fertility and long-term risks such as cancer.
Call for a moratorium
The authors call for a worldwide moratorium on the use of mRNA vaccines, ideally their complete withdrawal from the market. They emphasise that the pharmaceutical industry, and not independent scientists, should bear the responsibility for proving the safety of such interventions.
Conclusion
The study casts a gloomy light on the development and authorisation of mRNA vaccines. It emphasises the need for comprehensive, independent research to fully understand the potential dangers of these new technologies and to ensure the safety of the population.
