The first publication on SARS-CoV-2 was published on 07.01.2020 in the journal: Nature (A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3). When reading the publication, it becomes clear that no virus has been isolated and biochemically characterised. The SARS-CoV-2 genome is an arbitrary mathematical modelling. Thus, no proof of the real existence of SARS-CoV-2 has been provided and statements about the properties of the spike protein are hypothetical. The company “Wir sind immun GmbH”(https://bin-ich-schon-immun.de/) offers laboratory tests, such as the detection of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in blood. This detection method requires a specific antibody that binds to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
Source: Jeanette Bahr, 21.11.2024
In order to produce precisely this specific antibody, however, an isolated spike protein is needed using hybridoma technology (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hybridomtechnik.png). I have sent the following question by e-mail (the e-mail is available as a PDF) to the company “Wir sind immun GmbH”: “According to the publication, however, a SARS-COV-2 has never been isolated and biochemically characterised and therefore no spike protein has been isolated.
What exactly is used (i.e. what kind of protein) for the production of specific antibodies against the spike protein?”
The lack of an isolated spike protein was admitted by the company “Wir sind immun GmbH”. However, the question could not be answered by the company. I was informed by the company that the relevant laboratory, in this case MMD Magdeburg (https://www.mmd-labor.de/), would be the better contact for further questions. I then wrote to the MMD laboratory in Magdeburg on 19 August 2024 and have not received a reply to date.
This raises the following questions for me:
“Why can’t I get an answer to my question?”
“How meaningful are these laboratory tests?”
“Isn’t there a risk that people will be unnecessarily frightened by false positive results?”
The assertion of a specific antibody against a spike protein is problematic, as proteins are not rigid structures within the molecular concept, but wobble throughout and thus change their conformation. Without controls and without isolation of the spike protein, it remains unproven whether these antibodies react similarly or identically with other substances.
Isn’t it finally time to critically scrutinise the basics of laboratory tests? I would like to see it.
You can find additional information on this topic and other topics on the science platform: NEXT LEVEL – Wissen neu gedacht.
